 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Kate Albrecht
editThe article doesnt mention if they will bring back Kate Albrecht in the recurring role of the assistant to Debi Mazar's character. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:24DE:C889:35B6:EC1F:D220:DF96 (talk) 03:43, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Film image
editHBO already released the film's image, as it apears on the facebook page of Entourage and the film's IMDB page. Maybe could some user upload it to Wiki commons? Archwayh (talk) 12:31, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
Rick Nash got the entire New York Rangers team to a screening of Entouraage to relax and improve their play in the 2015 Stanley Cup playoffs.[1][2]
-- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 11:29, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
References
- ^ "23 May 2015". CBC News With Reshmi Nair. 23 May 2015. CBC Newsworld. @circa 7h20am
- ^ SI Wire (22 May 2015). "Rick Nash, Rangers screen Entourage movie before Game 4 vs Lightning". Sports Illustrated.
Semi-protected edit request on 5 June 2015
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Deadline.com says that the budget was 27.5 after tax credits. Also, it could be added that Warner's has spent over 35 million on the ad campaign for the movie. 70.190.77.12 (talk) 05:57, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Note: Note: This article is no longer Semi-Protected, so you can now edit the article yourself, but please ensure that any additions are properly sourced, to reliable sources and you maintain a neutral point of view - Arjayay (talk) 07:26, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Budget
editThe cited source seems to suggest that the budget for Entourage was not $39 million, but $39 million minus nearly $6 million.
This editor has been using his interpretation of budgets on several other pages, including at least four talk pages, where other editors have not reached a consensus. I ask him not to edit-war, for which he has been warned multiple times, and wait until his issues are resolved — which would have been a lot less time-consuming and confusing he had stuck with one talk page instead of four in an apparent effort to tire other editors out. --Tenebrae (talk) 16:13, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
- You have got to be kidding me. The spend clearly shows $39 million. And now you want to, by your own view, calculate a different budget by subtracting the tax credit?? You realize that you have been saying I can't add anything in every other place, but now it's fine for you to subtract?User:Chrisw80 this is what I am talking about. I made the proper edit, used a reliable source and the first action Tenebrae takes is to revert my edit because he disagrees with me in another place. Depauldem (talk) 16:58, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
- Honestly Depauldem, I think Tenebrae has a point here. The "reservation" would make up the difference between the sources, and BOM is likely to be a more appropriate source (non-primary). HOWEVER, you really should be following dispute resolution processes. Chrisw80 (talk) 17:13, 10 April 2016 (UTC)