Talk:Epigraphia Carnatica
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Epigraphia Carnatica appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 March 2008, and was viewed approximately 1,491 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Question
editSo why did he select the adjective "Carnatica"? Is that his neo-Latin form of Karnataka? (Okay, that's an obvious question, but the lack of an explanation is far less obvious.) -- llywrch (talk) 02:32, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
- Please go through the Carnatic region article which will provide you the answer -- ¿Amar៛Talk to me/My edits 05:28, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
- In reply: the name of the journal reflects colonial spelling; Rice was just following the accepted practice of his time. Shirazibustan (talk) 12:35, 13 November 2012 (UTC)Shirazibustan
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Epigraphia Carnatica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080220183957/http://www.flonnet.com:80/fl2223/stories/20051118000607600.htm to http://www.flonnet.com/fl2223/stories/20051118000607600.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:00, 25 December 2016 (UTC)