Talk:Equine nutrition/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA Sweeps: Kept

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing Sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I went through the article and made various changes, please look them over. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good Article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2007. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 18:31, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Overall, looks good. The Purina and Nutrena links were there as examples sourcing the statements that accompanied them, but if OK to be unsourced, whatever. Thanks for the sweep and the cleanup. Hopefully no one will kick that we have a few unfootnoted sentences now... LOL! Montanabw^(talk) 01:55, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

I removed the links as it could be seen as spam. See if there are other sources (perhaps magazine/newspaper articles) that cover those details. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 01:00, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Eventually...the WPEQ backlog responds primarily to crisis at the moment! LOL! Montanabw^(talk) 23:47, 7 July 2009 (UTC)