Talk:Ernie Shore/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Muboshgu (talk · contribs) 15:43, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Arconning (talk · contribs) 07:02, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

I will be reviewing this! Arconning (talk) 07:02, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

@Muboshgu Here are my comments! Hope they can be addressed. Arconning (talk) 07:03, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Arconning, all points responded to. Thanks for the review! – Muboshgu (talk) 00:50, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Prose and MoS

• I apologize but I love using the Oxford comma.
  • I do too. Where did I miss it? – Muboshgu (talk) 01:35, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
• Mentions of win-loss must be replace with win–loss.
  • Done – Muboshgu (talk) 01:35, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Lead and infobox

• from 1914 to 1917, add a comma at the end to "split up" the two clauses".
  • Done – Muboshgu (talk) 01:35, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
• New York Yankees from 1919 to 1920., add the at the start.
  • Done – Muboshgu (talk) 01:35, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
• the Red Sox purchased Shore in 1914, add comma at the end.
  • Done – Muboshgu (talk) 01:35, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
• Optional. He was elected as sheriff of Forsyth County, remove as.
  • Done – Muboshgu (talk) 01:35, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Early life

• Shore enrolled at Guilford College in 1910, add comma at the end.
  • Done – Muboshgu (talk) 01:35, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Baseball career

• 21–2 blowout against the Boston Braves; , replace semicolon with a period.
  • Done – Muboshgu (talk) 01:35, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
• Shore had a 11–12, an instead of a.
  • Done – Muboshgu (talk) 01:35, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
• Guilford in June 1914,, remove comma.
  • Done – Muboshgu (talk) 01:35, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
• which the Red Sox won, 2–1., remove comma.
  • I did and added by a score of – Muboshgu (talk) 00:50, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
• pains in his shoulder and his throwing arm, add that after and.
  • Done – Muboshgu (talk) 00:50, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
• Frank Gilhooley, Slim Love, Roxy Walters, add comma at the end.
  • Done – Muboshgu (talk) 00:50, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
• Shore had a 65-43, replace with endash.
  • Done – Muboshgu (talk) 00:50, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Later life

• Mentions of "current dollar terms" should have like "As of [DATE]..." to retain consistency.
  • The terms are consistent? Current means present day. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:50, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

  @Muboshgu That's true now but probably not 5 to 10 years from now. Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers#Statements likely to become outdated Arconning (talk) 04:16, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

  Arconning, that isn't an issue with the {{inflation}} template though, as I don't include the end_year parameter. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:35, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

  @Muboshgu Ahh I see, I didn't see that. Will be promoting this article now. Arconning (talk) 14:46, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

• President Franklin D. Roosevelt.., remove the extra period.
  • Done – Muboshgu (talk) 00:50, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
• It was named Ernie Shore Field, add a comma at the end.
  • Done – Muboshgu (talk) 00:50, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
• World Series champion, World Series-winning.
  • Done – Muboshgu (talk) 00:50, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Images

• Images have proper licenses and are relevant to the article.
• On the third image, why is the "(right)" italicized?
  • I got in that habit long ago. MOS:CAPFRAG says in part The text of captions should not be specially formatted (with italics, for example), except in ways that would apply if it occurred in the main text. Several discussions (e.g. this one) have failed to reach a consensus on whether "stage directions" such as (right) or (behind podium) should be in italics, set off with commas, etc. Any one article should use a consistent approach throughout. It's consistent with the other image that he shares with another person.

Refs

• Random ref check: 1, 13, 15, 29, 46, seems good.
• Earwig picks up nothing.

Misc

• No ongoing edit war, pretty broad information on the topic, focused.

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed