Talk:Erode district

Latest comment: 4 months ago by Magentic Manifestations in topic Proposed merge of Vilangkattuvalasu into Erode district

Untitled

edit

Shared Content Foundation is going to conduct a seminar in Erode district for the first time at Kongu_Engineering_College on 4th August, 2004. Many volunteers will be joining us if the work shops are arranged and we will create some interesting content not only for the institution but for the entire district.

Chella 11:12, 2 Aug 2004 (UTC)

This article is extremely out of balance. In some sections like Rivers, Transportation and Communication there is too much detail whereas in section such as history nothing. Too painful to edit this article and not to loose information --Vyzasatya 20:46, 6 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

I remodelled the data/ info in Transport section and Communication section to make it more readable. Think the article is in good shape to go out of cleanup desk --Vyzasatya 21:29, 6 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Kaveri or Cauvery

edit

Under the section "Bhavani River", the kaveri river is misspelt as Cauvery.. Is that okay or shall we change it to Kaveri

Fair use rationale for Image:Tnlogo.png

edit
 

Image:Tnlogo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:57, 20 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Erode district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:47, 26 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Erode district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:36, 23 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merge of Vilangkattuvalasu into Erode district

edit

Orphan stub with no references. Village does not have coordinates listed and neither of the names in the lede have results on google maps. Kazamzam (talk) 20:52, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi! If it is an orphan and a stub (one liner!), it should be rather a candidate for deletion rather than a merge as there is not much information there. An article related to a village cannot be merged into the main article concerning the district as it will create a laundry list or sea of blue of all the villages in the district, which is unwarranted. Thanks! Magentic Manifestations (talk) 05:09, 25 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
As it's unsourced, a redirect is probably best. Boleyn (talk) 09:01, 28 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Kazamzam @Boleyn @Magentic Manifestations Should I (or one of you) propose deletion (and then a redirect)? GoldRomean (talk) 16:27, 28 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
You are probably best, as there isn't clear consensus, to put it forward for AfD. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 21:58, 28 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Boleyn I have nominated it for deletion. Cheers, GoldRomean (talk) 00:25, 29 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
The article has been there from 2006 like this, probably many more like this may exist! Magentic Manifestations (talk) 05:21, 29 June 2024 (UTC)Reply