Talk:Eternal (group)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Eternal (group) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Louise Solo Career
edit"Louise embarked on her (what was to be considerably fruitful) solo career"
Are you sure about that?!
Louise got kicked out Eternal as at that time, a mixed race girl group could not be accepted in the world- Eternal management were about to take the girls overseas (the US). Three black girls and one white, this was by far too emancipated. Music is all about selling copies...
- Yes, that's why the Spice Girls bombed so spectacularly in the USA, isn't it..? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.13.64.30 (talk) 11:12, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
- Do you have a reliable source for that? — AnemoneProjectors (zomg!) 12:58, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
yea louise was treated very unfairly and was seemed the outsider of the group this needs to be looked into as it could be quite serouisVeggiegirl (talk) 21:32, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Eternal Greatest Hits.jpg
editImage:Eternal Greatest Hits.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Album cover in infobox
editI have once again removed the image of the Eternal Greatest Hits album based on Wikipedia:Non-free content. Per the acceptable use of images part of that page: "Some copyrighted images may be used on Wikipedia, providing they meet both the legal criteria for fair use, and Wikipedia's own guidelines for non-free content. Copyrighted images that reasonably can be replaced by free/libre images are not suitable for Wikipedia. 1. Cover art: Cover art from various items, for identification only in the context of critical commentary of that item (not for identification without critical commentary)."
An album cover should never be used to identify a group because there is no critical commentary of the album itself. A free use image could be found of the group and used in the infobox to identify the group. Aspects (talk) 18:41, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
Which year did they disband?
editThe article states that they ceased to exist as a group in 1999, but the infobox states years active 1992-2000. Could someone who knows for certain, which year they actually disbanded, please make the necessary correction, so that there is no longer any contradiction present in the article. Werdnawerdna (talk) 02:20, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
- Their final album was released at the end of 1999, but they were dropped by their label in 2000.79.66.40.159 (talk) 03:13, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Main Aricles for Bennet Sisters link back to Eternal article
edit^^ The links for the main articles for the Bennett sisters redirect back to this page. Remove them? --hubare (talk) 09:47, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
An earlier band with the same name
editThere was a shoegazing band, also called Eternal, who released only one single, "Sleep", on Sarah Records in 1990. Andrew07 (talk) 23:23, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Linking to my own site
editI am the owner of the "Power Of A Woman" website (evkl.net), named after Eternal's second album. I think (hope) it's ok to add this to the links, so I will do that; feel free to remove it if not. Something I'm not sure about is using my own site for citations; most of the material on there is second hand, so I guess it is best avoided. However, if there is no other source, is it sometimes appropriate, or a complete no-no? I am more interested in improving the quality of this page than getting a link to my site. LJFazy (talk) 19:37, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Louise
editThis article gives her name as Redknapp. However, as she left the band in 1995 and didn't marry until 1998 shouldn't she be named here as Louise Nurding? Britmax (talk) 20:04, 6 September 2014 (UTC).
- Redknapp is obviously incorrect, however her professional name isn't Louise Nurding, it's simply Louise. 86.155.212.53 (talk) 19:31, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Eternal (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120328135330/http://www.eternalfansite.co.uk/ to http://www.eternalfansite.co.uk/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:02, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Eternal (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110129054853/http://www.asmanagement.co.uk/Roster/59/Details.aspx to http://www.asmanagement.co.uk/Roster/59/Details.aspx/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:24, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Notification of related discussion
editThe "Vernie Bennett" article was proposed for merging.
Here: Talk:Vernie Bennett#Merge. (I would suggest you expand it and save it.) --Moscow Connection (talk) 05:44, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Maths
editI’m just putting up my name on it so I can login. 2A02:C7C:EE14:9B00:8533:8E7F:95A2:F51D (talk) 06:21, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Band break up due to homophobic views and anti-LGBTQ
editAccording to the daily mirror they are having problems to sell tickets due to homephobic views, https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/nineties-pop-group-eternal-forced-32227579 2A04:4A43:428F:FB79:C992:F395:207:386C (talk) 15:54, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- This is incorrect FALSE information to push an narrative, the band did not break up and are currently active and this needs to stop being listed as such. A performance was cancelled but the band is very much active aswell as the comeback. please post accurate and non-biased takes on the information you provide please and thank you BlueSoul004 (talk) 00:29, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- Who keeps editing the page as they're disbanded the group is currently active! BlueSoul004 (talk) 03:58, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- They don’t seem to be active at all as there’s no shows or news about them. 2A04:4A43:448F:E56B:AD84:D9F2:4402:AA30 (talk) 03:01, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Who keeps editing the page as they're disbanded the group is currently active! BlueSoul004 (talk) 03:58, 28 March 2024 (UTC)