Talk:European Spallation Source

References inexistent: 404

Hey there,

the references 2,3 and 5 lead to 404 pages. Could anyone who knows what was in these references search for them? Maybe they just moved... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.230.121.55 (talk) 15:07, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, they have been updated.--ESSuser1 (talk) 16:51, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on European Spallation Source. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www2.fz-juelich.de/ua/datapool/page/466/IEF-6_Waste%20Disposal.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718172315/http://juwel.fz-juelich.de:8080/dspace/bitstream/2128/290/1/Juel_4136_Moormann.pdf to http://juwel.fz-juelich.de:8080/dspace/bitstream/2128/290/1/Juel_4136_Moormann.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:29, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Start from scratch maybe?

I'm sorry I can't be more constructive, but this article is frankly ridiculous. If this was promotional material for investors or other clueless people, you would at least disregard all the useless fluff and look at the pretty pictures. But as an encyclopedic article, of a scientific project no less, it's just a disgrace. From the history I see that some ESS PR account wrote it. I'm not surprised. My advice would be to either

• delete the entire article and give the task to write a new one to some actual scientist involved in the project or alternatively,
• delete the entire article and let someone who isn't involved in the project write the article.

There's a reason it's usually ill advised to write your own Wikipedia page and the same goes for organizations tooting their own horn. --Mudd1 (talk) 17:49, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

I agree that there are room for improvements in this article. I have the intention to put some work with improving it. I just started with one section. BR --Bairuilong (talk) 15:16, 12 October 2022 (UTC)