Talk:Euston Square tube station
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Updates
edit'In December 2005...' What is the current state of play (almost nine years later)? Jackiespeel (talk) 21:49, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Euston Square tube station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.parliamentlive.tv/Main/Player.aspx?meetingId=8725&st=12%3A05%3A36
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161111061516/http://content.tfl.gov.uk/wtt-34-circle-and-hammersmith-and-city.pdf to http://content.tfl.gov.uk/wtt-34-circle-and-hammersmith-and-city.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:16, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
Inadequate/unclear explanation for reason why this station was not built to connect to Euston.
editI expected to find an explanation for the reason why this station was not built to connect to Euston, but it is not at all clear. It seems to be saying that the Met was trying to raise funds for another station beside Euston. But why didn't they build it there in the first place? They would surely have expected to capture traffic from the mainline. I realise that the tube line companies then were competitors who did each other no favours but the text is really unclear. It would be nice to know why we have to climb the escalator, go out in the rain for ten minutes, then down the steps. Could someone improve, please? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 17:42, 23 January 2019 (UTC)