Talk:Ewoks: The Battle for Endor

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Cindel is NOT Phasma

That's just a ridiculous fan theory that is in no way backed up by Lucasfilm. As such, that should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.197.149.12 (talk) 22:17, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

I concur and I am not the only one who agree's with this statement. It was some sick joke by Ewok movie haters who wanted this character to suffer a horrible fate that is not deserved. This was a movie aimed at children for crying out loud it's not going to adhere to the standards of an audience that goes to the theatrical STAR WARS Movies. Besides that Gwendolyne Christie is only an actress who does not write for STAR WARS nor does she officially represent the franchise in any way besides portraying Phasma. Just because she agree's with the fan throry and I repeat FAN THEORY, does not make it cannonical nor worthy of representation in a place that deals in the official facts. Any statement pertaining to this riddiculous theory should be removed from Caravan of Courage, Battle for Endor, and the Captain Phasma article. It is not a legacy of any kind it's just theory from Trolls.

Wikipedia is not a Reddit Forum.

Maxcardun 11/30/2020 10:21 AM — Preceding undated comment added 15:23, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Agreed. It's not about "excluding" things that don't match some official canon. It's certainly not about nitpicking the differences between "legends", "expanded universe" and "on-screen canon" and debating how those categories can interact. (Because that all matters exactly 0%)

But it **is** about only including things that are relevant. Fan theories are basically never included in WP articles.

(Disclosure:I made a similar removal on the other Ewoks movie article, and so Maxcardun paged me here. I don't consider this improper canvassing, because these articles really form a matched pair and I really should have checked this one after I edited the other.) ApLundell (talk) 20:29, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

poster is missing

the poster from the article seems to have been removed.Either we should upload it again or add a new one to the article.-Vmrgrsergr 02:43, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Blackfleet3.jpg

Image:Blackfleet3.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:34, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ewoks: The Battle for Endor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051124042330/http://www.holonetnews.com/49/regional/13328_2.html to http://www.holonetnews.com/49/regional/13328_2.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:55, 15 December 2017 (UTC)