Talk:Ex turpi causa non oritur actio
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ian Lacey (ISBN 0 646 04964 X) say that this principle operates in international law "to the effect that no legal claim to territory can arise of an illegal aggression.
Julius Stone use the above Latin phrase for effectively the same sense.
Professor Stephen Schwebel
editThis eminent judge of the International Court of Justice is a relevant authority on this subject.
Is this article not at all relevant to theLaw of nations?
- User:Ludvikus|Ludvikus]] 06:59, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Tinsley v Milligan [1992]
editHow many years did this case last? Is this date correct? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Moshe-paz (talk • contribs) 15:08, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
In answer in part to your question, it was recently over-ruled...
Patel v Mirza - major reconsideration
editIt seems the court completely reconsiderd the whole doctrine from the ground up, providing a whole new set of principles. These changes were sufficiently important to have whole books written about this one decision - for example: https://www.bloomsburyprofessional.com/uk/illegality-after-patel-v-mirza-9781509912773/