Talk:Eye of the Needle (novel)

Fair use rationale for Image:Op Fortitude Inflatable Tank.jpg

Image:Op Fortitude Inflatable Tank.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 06:47, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Requested move

Wait a minute, the title of this novel is Eye of the Needle, not The Eye of the Needle. This article used to have the name right, when did it change? See http://www.ken-follett.com/bibliography/index.html for proof. (Note that in the list on the right-hand side, the name is similarly incorrect, but everywhere else (including the cover image of the book) the title is given without the leading "the". I'll try to fix this later (including redirect pages) unless someone beats me to it. Sisterdetestai (talk) 04:15, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

• Support - Pretty clear cut, the actual name of the book is "Eye of the Needle". ƒingers^on_Roids 15:50, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Plot

The plot description is incorrect on a number of events of the novel and could definitely use revision for accuracy and for a more helpful description with emphasis placed on aspects in accordance with the book.162.84.38.84 (talk) 07:13, 11 April 2009 (UTC)