Talk:Fat Freddy's Drop/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by SMasters in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: S Masters (talk) 08:23, 15 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    References appear to be in order.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
    Article appears to be stable.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    Images comply to fair use requirements. Full stop missing on one of the captions.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Comments:

  • Names of songs and singles should be in quotation marks and not italics. Names of albums are in italics, see MOS:ITALICS.  Done Adabow (talk) 04:58, 18 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • There are low-level punctuation issues. Avoid too many semi-colons. If possible, break into two sentences. Please try to get an editor who has not worked on this article before to give it a once over for such errors.  Done, but it would be good if someone else could double-check it. Adabow (talk) 04:58, 18 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • Several sentences have three references or more. It is not desirable. If the references refer to different parts of a sentence, then put the reference exactly at the part of what it is referencing. Otherwise, choose the best reference for that statement and remove the rest.
  • Overlinking - Except for the lead, only wikify words on the first mention. There's no need to do it more than once unless the article is very long (this is not a long article). No need to wikify common words.
  • There's both "Top-40" and "top-40" - be consistent.  Done I replaced with "top 40" throughout article.Adabow (talk) 04:58, 18 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Summary: There are some minor copy edit work and other issues outlined above that need to be rectified. I will allow up to seven days for these to be resolved before making any further decisions.

Final comments: Thank you for all the hard work done in improving this article. I am now confident that all the requirements for a Good Article have been met, and it can now be passed. Well done! -- S Masters (talk) 07:23, 24 April 2010 (UTC)Reply