Former FLCFebruary 8 is a former featured list candidate. Please view the link under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. Once the objections have been addressed you may resubmit the article for featured list status.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 20, 2023Peer reviewReviewed
March 1, 2024Featured list candidateNot promoted
Current status: Former featured list candidate
This box: viewtalkedit
Selected anniversaries for the "On this day" section of the Main Page
Please read the selected anniversaries guidelines before editing this box.

February 8

Mary, Queen of Scots
Mary, Queen of Scots
More anniversaries:

I added the 100th anniversary of scouting to the page, shouldn't be too awful since its very notable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.62.238.106 (talk) 02:21, 2 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Births and Deaths

edit

Continuing the ongoing effort to reduce the size of the Births and Deaths sections to make them manageable, I'm removing some celebrities with few or no articles in other wikipedias, moving the entries to the appropriate Year in Topic article if they were not already present. This is in accordance with the guidelines. See discussions at Wikipedia_talk:Days_of_the_year.Deb (talk) 21:23, 12 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

holidays and observances - Feast of Orthodoxy

edit

The Feast of Orthodoxy is not known as being 42 days before Easter. It is known as being the first Sunday of Lent in the Orthodox calendar. The fact that it is 42 days before Easter is true, but irrelevant to the noteworthiness of the feast. --142.163.194.123 (talk) 17:04, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

A reliable reference containing the true facts would be really helpful. Deb (talk) 18:49, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
Is the website of the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America not reliable? If not, what would be?--142.163.194.123 (talk) 02:04, 9 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
no argument against, I shall put it in? I note that tomorrow, "clean Monday", is related to Great Lent. 142.163.195.167 (talk) 14:28, 15 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
Yes, please do, citing that source. Toddst1 (talk) 14:33, 15 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Notability of events/people

edit

Hi everyone!

I was going through the events and cleaning up the wording/styling and noticed these events (listed below). They don't seem particularly notable based on the content they provide and none of them have any sourcing either so would like to have some additional input regarding them and whether they should be kept/taken off the page.

Events: (putting my comments in bold)

These events have sources but I'm skeptical of their broader notability: (my comments in bold)

There's also one person listed in the Deaths section called Dayrolles Eveleigh-de-Moleyns (shown below) which I was able to locate a few incomplete sources but am doubtful over their notability for this article (their Wikipedia article almost entirely consists of his family ties, various searches I've conducted have turned up virtually nothing except a few minor references to his and the only thing which appears to give him his notability is his inherited peerage, which many, many people in the U.K. had at the time (and most British peers don't have their articles listed on DOY articles)).

Thanks! Dan the Animator 03:37, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Dantheanimator - thanks for all your work adding/improving citations. Have you made any changes to the above entries? Where there is more than one citation for an entry, do you want to choose which one you think is best, and remove the others, just to reduce the size of the References section? Also, there should not be two entries for Mary, Queen of Scots in both the Events and Deaths sections - could you remove one of them. Thanks! Kiwipete (talk) 03:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Kiwipete: thanks for the reply! Regarding the above entries, what do you mean by changes? Since moving them off the article here for discussion, I haven't edited them. If you think any of the above events should be re-added though, feel free to let me know with some reason as to why so we can discuss it I guess.
For the excessive citations, I completely agree (hence some of my recent edits) although I'm not an expert with what is and isn't WP:RS (especially when it comes to non-American sources) so I tend to be overcautious and just leave them all there for other editors with greater familiarity with the sources to decide (the main cases of this are those with the Finnish tabloids, those with museum/book/journal links that I either can't access fully or can't fully assess as to the adequateness as a source). For the sportspeople with multiple sources, if I remember right I add in the other sources since I wasn't sure if ESPN/Premier League's website/FIBA/NHL/etc. were fully reliable. If they are though (which I'm p sure they are), I can cut back there to keep it to one source per person. There's also cases where I had impartial sourcing (the ref would verify the death date but not the birth date and vice versa) so those are probably going to stay as multiple refs unless better sourcing can be found (although trust me, I've tried, it's just very, very tough when it comes to some of these people).
For the Queen Mary entries, thanks for pointing that out! I took out the entry in the death section. Let me know your thoughts on the above. Cheers, Dan the Animator 03:55, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Dantheanimator, I was being lazy when asking about those entries above ;) I now see that they have all been removed, which is what I would have recommended myself. I'm not an expert either with regards to citations, so yes probably better to leave them as they are until someone more knowledgeable can have a look. Kiwipete (talk) 04:05, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please add to February 8 birthday list Rui Hachimura

edit

To all admins please added birthday list for is Rui Hachimura, his birthday was dated February 8, 1998. So would like to added to birthday list for February 8? Thanks. Lovemuhcko (talk) 10:18, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

A citation is essential. Please give a reliable source. Deb (talk) 10:24, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

RfC on MOS:LEADLENGTH/Wikiproject Consensus

edit

Hey everyone, per the recommendations on the RfC page, I'm posting a link to the RfC I opened on DOY articles and an issue with their lead length here. Here's the brief version of the question for the RfC:

Should the leads of Days Of the Year (DOY) articles be expanded to comply with MOS:LEADLENGTH/WP:FLCR or should those policies be modified to create an exception for DOY articles per the apparent consensus against changing DOY leads?

Link to RfC

I added a expanded explanation of the question on the RfC page so please go there to get a full understanding of the issue. Cheers, Dan the Animator 02:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

In this discussion, as an example, I suggested expanding the lead for this page to include some or all of the following:
"On this day, in 421 CE, Constantius III became co-emporer of the Western Roman Empire, and Mary, Queen of Scots was executed in 1587. During the 20th century, Japan attacked Russia in 1904 and Singapore in 1942 on this date, and in 1946, North Korea officially became a communist state. In 1971, the world's first all-electronic stock market opened on this date.
In the northern hemisphere, February 8th falls in the winter, and in the southern hemisphere, it is summer, according to both astronomical and meteorological reckonings.
In 2025, February 8th will be the 100th anniversary of the birth of Jack Lemmon, American actor (d. 2001), the 200th anniversary of the birth of Henry Walter Bates, English geographer, biologist, and explorer (d. 1892), and the 300th anniversary of the death of Peter the Great, Russian emperor.
The latter paragraph would have to be updated each year. Changing the lead every year is normal in some subjects (e.g., annual events, which often give the date for the upcoming event), but some editors don't think it's worth the bother. Feel free to copy any of this to the article if you'd like to use it. WhatamIdoing (talk) 22:23, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply