Talk:Film Threat

Questions about this entry

Is the full editorial staff necessary here?

Also -- is does this "coldest celebrity" list really get that much attention?

I, for one, wouldn't be too upset if you took those out. --Misterwindupbird 18:32, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

Should the magazine's title be explained? I, for one, knew about FT long before I'd ever heard of Film Comment.

Agreed. It's out. DONE75.174.130.129 (talk) 15:19, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Actually, the "coldest celebrity" list gets a lot of attention. The most recent one, in November 2006, was featured on CNN, the BBC and the Reuters news wire. 205.247.175.179 17:55, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Unsourced content and wild claims

There are a lot of bold and wild claims in this article simply unsourced. I will put the content back in after they are properly cited. Right now, saying that FT received "acclaim" or that "FT aided Tarantino in his career" is laughable at best. If you can find a clear source of quote that didn't come from FT magazine then I'm all for putting this stuff back in. But a lot of this reads like adverts that I suspect were placed into this page by former writers/editors from FT. Please don't use Wikipedia to promote your magazine.75.174.130.129 (talk) 18:20, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Gone?

The website seems to be permanently down, I dunno how long it has been (maybe a internet archive search can say) but it would appear that Film Threat doesnt exist anymore. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.188.229.170 (talk) 13:31, 2 September 2014 (UTC)