This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cartoon Network, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Cartoon Network on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cartoon NetworkWikipedia:WikiProject Cartoon NetworkTemplate:WikiProject Cartoon NetworkCartoon Network articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
A fact from Fionna Campbell appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 February 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Latest comment: 9 months ago4 comments3 people in discussion
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
This is definitely a, uh, interesting article and hook. No sign of copyright violations, created 3 days ago and therefore new enough, and the article seems reasonably sourced and well written. The source is of questionable reliability (marked as no consensus at WP:RSP), but for something like this I'm going to assume it is acceptable enough. QPQ was done as well. Approving this nomination. λNegativeMP102:38, 1 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Awesome, thanks for the review! It seems like most of the RSP discussions are about DB's possible political biases and whether its usable for BLPs, so I think it should be fine for stuff like this. BuySomeApples (talk) 04:38, 1 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
This is definitely a, uh, interesting article and hook. No sign of copyright violations, created 3 days ago and therefore new enough, and the article seems reasonably sourced and well written. The source is of questionable reliability (marked as no consensus at WP:RSP), but for something like this I'm going to assume it is acceptable enough. QPQ was done as well. Approving this nomination. λ NegativeMP1 02:38, 1 January 2024 (UTC)