Talk:Fitzpatrick's War
 | Fitzpatrick's War was a Language and literature good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Fitzpatrick's War removed from Wikipedia:Good articles
editFitzpatrick's War (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) was formerly listed as a good article, but was removed from the listing because :No references are stated, a requirement of GA. AndyZ 15:22, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
- I have no specific axe to grind (except that I now want to read the book). But I find this a bit peculiar - surely, as a work of fiction, the book is its own reference? The only other thing I can think of is that the author of the piece needs to prove that the book really exists, I guess. Tarquin Binary 16:45, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Usually they consider reviews and references to the book elsewhere as potential good sources. Look especially for reviews in mainstream and print publications such as TIME, Entertainment Weekly, etc. A minimum of three sources (i.e. more than just the book itself) is usually required to maintain GA status IIRC. A critical reception section would be a welcome addition to an article like this, for one. 68.202.85.105 (talk) 04:43, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Failed GA
editI found this old GA nomination, which was not listed on the candidates page. I am updating the tag as a failure because of the lack of cited sources. Chubbles 23:19, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
New Map Needed
editThe current maps have a lot of mistake, beginning with the first one. First several South American nations are missing (Peru, Venezuela, Guyana). Second the Carribean Confederacy was never Yukon ally state even though they signed the Four Points immediately. Third the book mentions the Yukon control the Falklands. Fourth, the Turkish empire didn't control that much of North Africa at the beginning of the book, so their southern border needs to be moved up. Finally there is no mention of the southern African state that sided with the Yukon during the Four Points War. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 19:16, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Fitzpatrick's War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20041211003316/http://www.bordersstores.com:80/features/feature.jsp?file=judson to http://www.bordersstores.com/features/feature.jsp?file=judson
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:35, 13 January 2016 (UTC)