Talk:Five Elements Ninjas

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by Hong Kong Cinema (assessed as Low-importance).

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (19)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (60) • B-Class articles (295)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (1,054)

Image needed (348)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,479) • Stub-Class articles (6,682)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (387) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,339)

Film: Chinese

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Chinese cinema task force.

Beyond Hollywood

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

What makes this site notable or usable for reviews? Their about page doesn't really say much nor does the author of the article in question here suggest that it's anything outside self-published source, which fails WP:SPS. Thoughts? Andrzejbanas (talk) 02:15, 3 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Notability has nothing to do with article content. Beyond Hollywood had editorial overview, but the site is defunct now. It is not self-published any more than AllMovie is. For example, here is a snapshot of their "about us" page from 2013, which clearly lists an editor. Personally, I don't see the point in listing a review from Allmovie. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:53, 3 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the archive link. Even with it though, I'm not terribly convinced by the site. Does it have a payed staff? There is nothing on the page suggesting why we should take these guys as serious reviewers. Per WP:NEWSORG, I don't think we should be using them. As for AllMovie, it has been used in several articles including a few good articles and used as a database by the New York Times. The reviewer himself, has been a credited source in several books, a few of which you can see here: here. I'm not entirely convinced that Beyond Hollwood passes WP:SELFPUBLISH, unless you have other proof to show me. Andrzejbanas (talk) 11:47, 3 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic