Talk:Fixated Threat Assessment Centre
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editThis article mentions a newspaper article which "contained misleading statements". According to who? Reference needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Julmust (talk • contribs) 14:34, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
I thought the same thing, also the article didn't claim that the FTAC was for locking up dissidents. Just edited this bit to quote from the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.113.253.51 (talk) 21:08, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
See
editSee http://www.theyworkforyou.com/search/?s=%22Fixated+Threat+Assessment+Centre%22&o=p for a search of Hansard material about FTAC: this seems to be the major source of authoritative information on FTAC. -- The Anome (talk) 12:58, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
Tone of article
editPart of the Rationale section mentions "mentally ill loners". Although it made me smile, this doesn't sound like a typical way an encyclopedia would be written. Mongoosander (talk) 23:08, 18 February 2015 (UTC)