Talk:Flaws and All

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleFlaws and All has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starFlaws and All is part of the B'Day series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 23, 2007Articles for deletionRedirected
March 13, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed
April 21, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed
July 17, 2011Good article nomineeListed
September 9, 2013Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Promo single?

edit

A live video was released to the iTunes Store and MTV.com. Would that make it a promo single? Adabow (talk · contribs) 03:24, 15 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

That would make sense. I mean, Knowles did perform the song profusely outside of tours. Would we make the page a promotional single on that note? Or do we need concrete evidence? Theuhohreo (talk) 03:31, 15 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
Other promos such as Daddy and Why Don't You Love Me don't have any sources stating "promo single". Hmmm, maybe it needs release as a song, too... Adabow (talk · contribs) 03:44, 15 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
Probably... "Flaws and All" is the only one without an actual release, digitally or radio-y... lol Theuhohreo (talk) 03:51, 15 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
I will not consider it as a promo single. Since when video releases are being considered as single release? Jivesh Talk2Me 07:24, 15 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
I agree with Jivesh. If that were the case then we could say the same about the multiple videos on her B'Day Anthology. RatiziAngeloucontribs 19:13, 16 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
No, "Flaws and All" had a live performance video sent to the iTunes Store and MTV.com. It has nothing to do with the Anthology album. But I believe that an audio release is required for promo single. So I will drop this discussion. Adabow (talk · contribs) 20:51, 16 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Flaws and All. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:58, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Flaws and All. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:24, 1 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Flaws and All. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:45, 2 October 2017 (UTC)Reply