Talk:Forkhead Box Protein L2

	This redirect was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This redirect was accepted from this draft on 9 April 2019 by reviewer I dream of horses (talk · contribs).

Molecular Biology: Genetics

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
	This redirect is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Merge proposal

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I support the merge, and I'd say that this page is slightly better in terms of content. The other page has less content and mainly looks long due to the giant infobox. As for which title is better, I'm not sure I know enough about the subject to say which would be more common. However, as of today, this article has 48 views in the last 30 days, and the other has 363 despite being older.

I think the solution is to lean more heavily on this article in terms of content, but to put it under Forkhead box L2 OR, even better, under FOXL2. The page for the entire family, FOX proteins, has most of the articles using that terminology.

The loser should be turned into a redirect, though. Or if using FOXL2, both pages should be redirects. I'm not experienced with merges at all, so I'd like to defer to someone else. If nobody addresses this though, I'll do my best. Prometheus720 (talk) 01:27, 26 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Prometheus720 (GreatSculptorIthas): The article was terrible in terms of content due to reasons mentioned here. This long overdue merge has been done. SUM1 (talk) 01:13, 5 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic