Talk:Fort Greely

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Synapse001 in topic CBW testing

Related article

edit

There is a related magazine article, that may be a source for this Wikipedia article, here. The article focuses on the missile defense system and is quite readable. Hope it is helpful. N2e (talk) 22:46, 26 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

CBW testing

edit

The article should probably mention the biochemical warfare testing at Fort Greely's Gerstle River test site from 1962 to 1973[1], [2], [3],[4]. Some tests were part of Project 112. Congress and Alaska were very interested when they first heard it in the early 70s. Twang (talk) 17:01, 30 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

At the very least link to the Wiki "Night Train" article page. [5] Synapse001 (talk) 15:56, 1 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Fort Greely. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:20, 4 October 2017 (UTC)Reply