Talk:Four Year Undergraduate Programme protests
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Heartily in topic Recent revert by David Gerard
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Please circulate among the academic fraternity for further editing. Heartily (talk) 22:01, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Recent revert by David Gerard
editHi David, can you please discuss this here?
- You deleted the recent 2019 news update related to the row. I had explained why I had added the deprecated source back. It is only in reference to the source itself. If the source to DM can't be added, then you can't even have an article on the Daily Mail by that logic on Wikipedia either. Please respond here before reverting changes.
- Even if you remove the source as unreliable again, please do not undo all other new changes made to the article. Thanks.
Heartily (talk) 10:23, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
- If all you have is the WP:DAILYMAIL, you don't have a source. If you have other changes, then you should add them without deliberately adding an unreliable source to Wikipedia - David Gerard (talk) 10:31, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
- I have now removed the source. But the problem with your revert is you deleted all the new changes/updates with it. This sort of thing is disruptive and not a productive approach. Heartily (talk) 11:13, 1 December 2020 (UTC)