Talk:Francis Procter

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Francis Procter article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Christianity: Anglicanism Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Anglicanism (assessed as Mid-importance).

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Francis Procter appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 August 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that "the old man was startled and a little shocked" when he was shown Walter Frere's revision of his book?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2024/August. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Francis Procter.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

Latest comment: 1 month ago5 comments3 people in discussion

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PrimalMustelid talk 18:51, 23 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

( Comment or view )

( Article history links:

)

... that "the old man was startled and a little shocked" when he was shown Walter Frere's revision of his book?

Source: Jenkins, Claude (January 1955). "[Untitled]". The English Historical Review. 70 (274): 157. JSTOR 556939.

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Lewis Worthington Smith, Template:Did you know nominations/Red (Taylor's Version)
Comment: ~~QPQ to come~~

Created by Pbritti (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 51 past nominations.

Pbritti (talk) 17:27, 30 June 2024 (UTC).Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Francis Procter is not new/expanded enough to be considered for a DYK, so review is for A History of the Book of Common Prayer only. Suggesting ALT0A:
...that Francis Procter was "startled and a little shocked" when he was shown Walter Frere's revision of his book?"
Bogger (talk) 11:37, 21 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Bogger: Both articles were moved to mainspace from userspace drafts on 30 June. The nomination occurred the same day. ~ Pbritti (talk) 13:34, 21 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

My bad. ALT1 approved -Bogger (talk) 14:12, 21 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic