Talk:Frank Fitzgerald (American football)

Latest comment: 2 months ago by WikiOriginal-9 in topic GA Review

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 15:40, 16 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Moved to mainspace by BeanieFan11 (talk). Self-nominated at 18:12, 23 February 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Frank Fitzgerald (American football); consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.Reply


GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Frank Fitzgerald (American football)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: BeanieFan11 (talk · contribs) 19:16, 23 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: WikiOriginal-9 (talk · contribs) 19:54, 23 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
  • Added GM cat.
  • Added WW2 cat.
  • "was an American football executive" should we change that to "was an American professional football executive"
  • Lowercase draft in the lead and body I guess.
  • "later renamed to the Tennessee Titans". Change to "now known as the Tennessee Titans" so as not to repeat "later" twice in one sentence.
  • "That year, the team compiled a record of 3–9" Change the team to "the Yanks". "the team" was getting a little repetitive.
  • "executive with the Houston Oilers (later Tennessee Oilers / Titans" Change to "now known as the Tennessee Titans".
  • "the person who announced the team's NFL Draft selections to league officials" That makes it sound like he was on TV or something. I don't think he was though? Suggest changing to "gave the team's NFL draft selections to league officials" That part in the lead might need revising also to make it less confusing.

I think that's everything. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 19:54, 23 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.