Talk:Frederic Growse
Latest comment: 3 years ago by SL93 in topic Did you know nomination
A fact from Frederic Growse appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 May 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 23:40, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the first illustrated complete English translation of the Ramayana of Tulsidas was completed by Frederic Growse in 1883 in Bulandshahr?
- ALT1:... that Frederic Growse used John Ruskin's principles of architecture to build a Gothic revival Catholic church (pictured) in India? Philafrenzy (talk) 19:14, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reviewed: Lady Ganga
Created by Whispyhistory (talk) and Philafrenzy (talk). Nominated by Whispyhistory (talk) at 19:05, 19 April 2021 (UTC).
- Article is new enough and long enough. It's neutrally written, and the sources appear to be reliable. No copyvio detected. I prefer ALT0—this would mean excluding the image, though it would be fine to use. QPQ completed. There's a "lead too short" template box at the top, but it's not a dispute, so I think it's good to go. Cstickel(byu) (talk) 21:40, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
- Whispyhistory, could we switch your first hook to active rather than passive voice, e.g.
- ALT2 ... that Frederic Growse finished the first complete, illustrated, English translation of the Ramayana of Tulsidas in 1883?
- I don't think the location is necessary, and ALT2 eliminates the duplication of complete/completed. MeegsC (talk) 14:44, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- @MeegsC:...fine with me...thanks for taking the time to look. Whispyhistory (talk) 17:11, 29 April 2021 (UTC)