Talk:Frederick Seguier Drake
Frederick Seguier Drake has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 19, 2024. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Frederick Seguier Drake appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 June 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
GA Review
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Frederick Seguier Drake/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Generalissima (talk · contribs) 07:04, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Generalissima After reading the article, here are my comments! I can definitely say he's a certified loverboy to his wife Dora 💙. Arconning (talk) 15:07, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Arconning I think I fixed up everything :3 Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 21:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Generalissima Just decided to be bold and edit a tiny piece of text out. Everything looks okay and will be passing! Arconning (talk) 02:10, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Arconning I think I fixed up everything :3 Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 21:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Arconning (talk · contribs) 15:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- I will be reviewing this article, comments will probably be finished in the next 72 hours! Wonder if this Drake's a certified loverboy too. Arconning (talk · contribs)
Prose and MoS
editLead
edit- was a Chinese-born, just a quick question, is his nationality ambiguous so that Chinese-born British isn't put?
- I could not find a source which explicitly calls him British, even though he certainly was... But it turns out one of the sources I already use calls him English, so, yes much better put. - G
- throughout occupation, throughout the occupation. Grammatically correct originally but that's just my suggestion^^ It's alright if not followed.
- Flows better with a the, I think you're right. - G
- by which point Drake, change by to at.
- Good point. - G
- a position as the Professor of Chinese Studies, remove the.
- Fixed. - G
- and foundation of what would become the University Museum and Art Gallery., add the before foundation.
- Fixed. - G
Biography lead
edit- On 13 April, 1892,, remove comma after April. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers#Formats.
- Oops, yeah. Fixied. - G
- He was enrolled in the University of London, replace in with at.
- Fixed. - G
- Drake thought favorably of the experience, and, remove comma.
Japanese occupation
edit- while Dora and the child remained in England., no problems with the sentence, just think it's funny to put their son as "the child". True enough so no issues with it.
- Possibly say the reason why the major anti-British political campaign happened, most likely because of the Tientsin incident.
Chinese Civil War and aftermath
edit- after the end of the war,, remove comma.
- Fixed. - G
- it as a "island held by guerrillas [...] , an island.
- Fixed. - G
Hong Kong
edit- He died on 21 August, 1974., remove comma per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers#Formats.
- Fixed. - G
Published works
edit- Never seen this type of section but the formatting looks great to me. Image supplied is great! (Maybe put a lang-zh and pinyin template).
- That is a lang-zh template :3
Refs
edit- Good sources, first time seeing a Bible verse as a note properly!
Spotchecks
edit- Manual and automated spotcheck show nothing. Pass.
Images
edit- Images have proper licenses and have suitable captions!
Misc.
edit- Broad information about the main topic, no ongoing edit war, focused on the topic. Really nice work!
Good Article review progress box
|
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on August 21, 2024. |
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 16:01, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- ... that Drake discovered an ancient Chinese city?
- Source: Li, Min (2008). Conquest, Concord, and Consumption: Becoming Shang in Eastern China, p. 70 https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/60866
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Mounir Akbache and Template:Did you know nominations/Nozawana
Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 07:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Both article need end-of-sentence cites for the fact of him discovering the city. The source confirms the claim ("He discovered the Shang deposits at Daxinzhuang"). The source is a doctoral dissertation, but it seems to have a decent number of citations according to Scholar, so I think it's fine to use. Earwig's clear for both articles and no other issues I can see, so gtg once the end-of-sentence cites are added. AryKun (talk) 13:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- @AryKun: Oops! Added end of sentence cites. Thank you! Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 13:49, 14 May 2024 (UTC)