 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Speedy Deletion
editThis is a fairly popluar game with 17,000 hits in Google. Kc4 21:28, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- I have made a few styleistic edits and removed plagerised material. Kc4 21:58, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Development Information
editIs it within the scope of the Wikipedia article to discuss the development of the game? Information on this could be found on the game's website and from the project of the month article. 193.157.182.115 13:24, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
I was thinking the same thing, and including information on how the game differs or improves on the original Colonization. Ianboggs 04:28, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
-Good idea! 193.157.188.13 13:18, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
FreeCol 0.11.0 released
edithttp://www.freecol.org/news/freecol-0.11.0-released.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anttipng (talk • contribs) 19:05, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Criticism
editInspired by the wpde article, I added some criticism to this article. Whoever disagrees should read Zinn. User:ScotXWt@lk 16:11, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- Shouldn't criticism sections be used to refer to existing criticism, and not simply add an arbitrary novel critique? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.212.158.218 (talk • contribs)
- Yes, they should. Removed it. The dewiki example is equally problematic, using sources that discussion Civ IV to comment on FreeCol. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 17:14, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Not a manual
editFreeCol has a rather decent manual, and it's covered by the civilization wikia to some degree (+libregamewiki). Can we please get rid of some details here as suggested by Qwertyus in this diff? –Be..anyone 💩 05:38, 26 April 2016 (UTC)