Talk:French cruiser Lalande

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Hog Farm in topic GA Review
Good articleFrench cruiser Lalande has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starFrench cruiser Lalande is part of the Protected cruisers of France series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 22, 2020Good article nomineeListed
October 19, 2021Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:French cruiser Lalande/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 16:28, 20 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Criteria

edit

1. Prose   On hold

2. Verifiability  Pass

3. Depth of Coverage  Pass

4. Neutral  Pass

5. Stable  Pass

6. Illustrations  Pass

7. Miscellaneous   On hold

Comments

edit

1.

  • Consider linking reserve in the lead to Reserve fleet where you're talking about the ship status, not the specific fleet
    • Done
  • "and she had provisions to carry up to 150 naval mines" - Maybe it's an English variant thing, but provisions seems really weird to me in this context
    • Switched to "capacity"

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

  • Add a short description
    • Doesn't Wikidata do that automatically? I confess I don't know much about Wikidata or short descriptions, though.
      • Wikidata item is under a different title and is not linked to this article. [1]. I'll go ahead and add it manually here.
  • Consider adding alt text for the images. It's not a requirement for GA-status but helps with accessibility/screen readers and is often asked for in ACR and FAC.
    • Added one for the lead image, but I don't know what exactly is useful info for the map. Any ideas?

That's it. This article is in really good shape. The two points under 7. aren't mandatory, but are things that would be helpful additions to the article. Hog Farm (talk) 20:30, 20 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for another review! Parsecboy (talk) 16:20, 22 June 2020 (UTC)Reply