French cruiser Lalande has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
French cruiser Lalande is part of the Protected cruisers of France series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:French cruiser Lalande/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 16:28, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Criteria
edit2. Verifiability ✓ Pass
3. Depth of Coverage ✓ Pass
4. Neutral ✓ Pass
5. Stable ✓ Pass
6. Illustrations ✓ Pass
Comments
edit1.
- Consider linking reserve in the lead to Reserve fleet where you're talking about the ship status, not the specific fleet
- Done
- "and she had provisions to carry up to 150 naval mines" - Maybe it's an English variant thing, but provisions seems really weird to me in this context
- Switched to "capacity"
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
- Add a short description
- Doesn't Wikidata do that automatically? I confess I don't know much about Wikidata or short descriptions, though.
- Wikidata item is under a different title and is not linked to this article. [1]. I'll go ahead and add it manually here.
- Doesn't Wikidata do that automatically? I confess I don't know much about Wikidata or short descriptions, though.
- Consider adding alt text for the images. It's not a requirement for GA-status but helps with accessibility/screen readers and is often asked for in ACR and FAC.
- Added one for the lead image, but I don't know what exactly is useful info for the map. Any ideas?
- Not sure. Since it's not a requirement for GA, that can just be left alone. Hog Farm (talk) 19:20, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Added one for the lead image, but I don't know what exactly is useful info for the map. Any ideas?
That's it. This article is in really good shape. The two points under 7. aren't mandatory, but are things that would be helpful additions to the article. Hog Farm (talk) 20:30, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for another review! Parsecboy (talk) 16:20, 22 June 2020 (UTC)