Talk:French destroyer Le Flibustier
Latest comment: 5 years ago by CPA-5 in topic GA Review
 | French destroyer Le Flibustier has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: September 15, 2019. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:French destroyer Le Flibustier/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: CPA-5 (talk · contribs) 15:20, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Claim my seat here. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 15:20, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
- but was seized by the Germans after the Italian armistice Pipe Germans to Nazi Germany.
- counter the large destroyers of the Italian Navigatori and Japanese Fubuki classes Pipe both Italian and Japanese to the Kingdom of Italy and the Empire of Japan.
- using steam provided by four Sural-Penhöet forced-circulation boilers Link Sural-Penhöet.
- a maximum speed of 39.1 knots (72.4 km/h; 45.0 mph) Is it possible to round the nought?
- Nope
- Their anti-aircraft armament consisted of one twin mount for 37 mm (1.5 in) Add "(AA)" after anti-aircraft.
- two twin Hotchkiss 13.2 mm (0.5 in) anti-aircraft machinegun mounts Machinegun? I've never ever seen a word like that.
- Pretty common to run them together in this country, which is why the link works
- German request to complete her and redesignated her as FR35 Link FR35.
- No point, it would just redirect here
- Link Allied.
- No edit wars.
Infobox
- The maximum speed doesn't match with the maximum speed in the body?
- The main body has the designed speed, 37 knots, and the results of Le Hardi's trials, 39.1 knots
- We have no "Ordered" part in the infobox?
- Hey Sturm could you please address this one or reply why we should not address it? Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 09:11, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
- It's there.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:20, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
Sources
- Is it me or there is no citation of Whitley?
- Cite 6
- How about Jordan & Caresse, Sturm? Does it look like there is no ref in the article about their source or is it just me? Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 09:44, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Definitely not you, but me being in a rush to maintain my one-a-day nomination rate.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:29, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- No ORs.
Images
- Looks fine to me.
That's anything from me. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 22:35, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for looking this over.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:14, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- Looks to good to go to me. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 19:36, 15 September 2019 (UTC)