Talk:French destroyer Le Flibustier/GA1
Latest comment: 5 years ago by CPA-5 in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: CPA-5 (talk · contribs) 15:20, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Claim my seat here. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 15:20, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
- but was seized by the Germans after the Italian armistice Pipe Germans to Nazi Germany.
- counter the large destroyers of the Italian Navigatori and Japanese Fubuki classes Pipe both Italian and Japanese to the Kingdom of Italy and the Empire of Japan.
- using steam provided by four Sural-Penhöet forced-circulation boilers Link Sural-Penhöet.
- a maximum speed of 39.1 knots (72.4 km/h; 45.0 mph) Is it possible to round the nought?
- Nope
- Their anti-aircraft armament consisted of one twin mount for 37 mm (1.5 in) Add "(AA)" after anti-aircraft.
- two twin Hotchkiss 13.2 mm (0.5 in) anti-aircraft machinegun mounts Machinegun? I've never ever seen a word like that.
- Pretty common to run them together in this country, which is why the link works
- German request to complete her and redesignated her as FR35 Link FR35.
- No point, it would just redirect here
- Link Allied.
- No edit wars.
Infobox
- The maximum speed doesn't match with the maximum speed in the body?
- The main body has the designed speed, 37 knots, and the results of Le Hardi's trials, 39.1 knots
- We have no "Ordered" part in the infobox?
- Hey Sturm could you please address this one or reply why we should not address it? Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 09:11, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
- It's there.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:20, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
Sources
- Is it me or there is no citation of Whitley?
- Cite 6
- How about Jordan & Caresse, Sturm? Does it look like there is no ref in the article about their source or is it just me? Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 09:44, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Definitely not you, but me being in a rush to maintain my one-a-day nomination rate.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:29, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- No ORs.
Images
- Looks fine to me.
That's anything from me. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 22:35, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for looking this over.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:14, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- Looks to good to go to me. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 19:36, 15 September 2019 (UTC)