Talk:French ironclad Héroïne

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:French ironclad Héroïne/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 14:25, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

• Indicate in the infobox that the draft figure is at deep load
• "The ship displaced between 5,969 metric tons (5,875 long tons)" - The use of between is odd here. It implies there's a second figure in the range, which should be added. If there's not a second figure, remove "between"
• Just out of curiosity, is the upper figure in the the complement range for when it was a flagship? Is so, it should probably be indicated.
  • You're probably right, but not specified in the sources.
• Prose gives conning tower armor as 100 mm, infobox gives 102 mm
• Waterline is a duplink
• I'm not seeing where the Stenzel and Konstam references listed in the bibliography are used
  • Deleted Konstam, Stenzel is referenced in #10. Every once in a while I combine refs when it's too much trouble to sort out which fact goes with which source.
• In the Roche ref, (1671-1870) looks like it's part of a volume name. If so, it should be with the volume name, not stuck after the OCLC.
• Any chance of an OCLC for Stenzel and Wilson?
• Worldcat suggests that Roche is in French, if that's correct, then indicate in the citation

That's it, I believe. Just a little tidying up to do here. Hog Farm _Bacon 16:16, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Looks like I forgot to update the bibliography on this article, n'est-ce pas? Thanks for reviewing this so quickly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:03, 31 August 2020 (UTC)