Talk:Frogner Park

File:FrognerPark.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:FrognerPark.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:58, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Vigelansparken.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Vigelansparken.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:59, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

File:VigelandObelisk.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:VigelandObelisk.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:59, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Frognerparken.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Frognerparken.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:20, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Vigeland Installation section

this section has quite a bit of opinion in it (some of which is interpretation of the statues/artwork). none of the opinions have attributions. Colbey84 (talk) 03:54, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

agree. Opinions and interpretations can be removed and perhaps pasted here future refrence in case attribution/source is found. --Erik den yngre (talk) 00:02, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

um...so WHO is supposed to do that? i mean, i would have but i didn't think i should. i thought i was supposed to bring it up on the Talk page and...let someone else take care of it, lol. it's because i thought most pages had a person or persons who kinda "watched over" them. didn't want to step on any toes.Colbey84 (talk) 12:27, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

You are free to go ahead and improve the article according to WP guidelines. It is of course wise to propose changes on discussion page first. You can also tag sentences with "citation needed" or "who" to indicate subjective points. WP guidelines clearly say that original research (the contributor's own research, analysis or opinion) is not allowed. Opinions must be attributed and complete reference inserted in text. So I suggest that you carefully remove sentences that are not factual descriptions, and paste them below. Thanks. --Erik den yngre (talk) 17:07, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Proposing change on the talkpage first for something like this is not necessary - WP:BEBOLD. ~Kvng (talk) 18:36, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Removed interpretations

"This is meant to represent man’s desire to become closer with the spiritual and divine. It portrays a feeling of togetherness as the human figures embrace one another as they are carried toward salvation." "It is a symbol of eternity, and implies the overall theme of the park: man’s journey from the cradle to the grave." The section need to be inspected, possible remaining subjective content and lack of references to sources. --Erik den yngre (talk) 17:43, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

"It took Vigeland from 1906 to 1947 to establish the monument.[citation needed]." It's hard to tell what establish is meant to mean here, but Vigeland died in 1943, and the idea of a sculptural installation in Frogner Park only arose in 1924 when the city authorities donated a building there for him to move to when they demolished his house: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gustav_Vigeland Unless anyone can throw some light on this, and provide the citation that was requested in 2015, I intend to remove it - Robocon1 (talk) 11:04, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Frogner Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100527085545/http://www.fpvenner.no/frognerparken.html to http://www.fpvenner.no/frognerparken.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141220172216/http://www.kulturminnesok.no/Lokaliteter/Oslo/Oslo/Frognerparken-og-Vigelandsanlegget to http://www.kulturminnesok.no/Lokaliteter/Oslo/Oslo/Frognerparken-og-Vigelandsanlegget
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110602132748/http://www.aktivioslo.no/frognerparkens_historie.php to http://www.aktivioslo.no/frognerparkens_historie.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:47, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Frogner Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120622035126/http://www.fpvenner.no/om_frognerparken.html to http://www.fpvenner.no/om_frognerparken.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://vigeland.museum.no/no/frognerparken/monolitten
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.vigeland.museum.no/no/frognerparken/andre-skulpturer

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:22, 7 December 2017 (UTC)