This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Infobox
editNo, it's not "rubbish". When an editor is editing information, it best that then template is readable as possible and not a jumbled up mess. There are no rules or guidelines that for forbid or discourage the practice of spacing the templates. Plus there the fact that source pages for these do present them in spaced form supports my argument. Clearly your edit is disruptive. Sarujo (talk) 19:39, 14 January 2012 (UTC)