Talk:Gabriel (2007 film)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Former good article nomineeGabriel (2007 film) was a Media and drama good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 22, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed

Plot section

edit

The plot section I've added is approximately 600 words long, which is the suggested length according to the style guidelines. If you're wondering why I wrote 'archangel' as 'Arc angel,' it's because that's how the term appears in the media kit for this film. Spelling of demons names also tallies with this document, even though many are more commonly spelled differently. The characters I've mentioned by name are correct (I think), but I'm not entirely confident I know who the seven Arcs and the seven Fallen actually are. The six Arcs I know are: Michael, Gabriel, Raphael, Ithuriel, Amitiel, Uriel... I don't remember the name of the seventh. Anyone? The Fallen I'm confident on are: Sammael, Asmodeus, Lilith, Ahriman, Balan. The ones I've guessed from the IMDB character list are Baliel and Molloch, but I can't really be sure of their roles in the film. Anyone know for sure? Iscaria 12:01, 15 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

124.188.67.216 there's no reason to substantially shorten the plot summary: 600 words is the perfect length according to to style guidelines for film articles, and it keeps the length of the plot section in keeping with the length of the other sections. If you were trying to remove the spoilers, keep in mind that it is wikipedia policy that it is not acceptable to delete information because it spoils the plot. Thanks for catching the mistake I made in the cast list. Iscaria (talk) 02:19, 18 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
124.188.67.216 again drastically shortened the plot section. I am beginning to suspect that this IP address may belong to a person involved with the production of this film who is trying to keep the plot of the film surprising for as long as possible. Unfortunately, it's significantly decreasing the completeness of this article and goes against wikipedia policy. 124.188.67.216, please come here and talk about your intentions. Else, this article may need to be partially locked. Iscaria (talk) 22:10, 18 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

I've confirmed the names of the 7 Arcs and 7 Fallen from the Supanova podcast: Michael, Gabriel, Raphael, Ithuriel, Amitiel, Uriel, Remial. Sammael, Asmodeus, Lilith, Ahriman, Balan, Baliel, Molloch. Iscaria (talk) 08:37, 24 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

I got the US dvd of Gabriel but there was no post-credits scene at the end. Where should this be explained on the page. Starmage2 (talk) 00:01, 24 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

GA on hold

edit

Hello. I'll be doing the Good Article review for this article. Here are some things to fix before I can pass the article:

  • Per WP:LEAD, the lead is supposed to summarize all the main points of the article, and for an article this size, should be three or four paragraphs. I would add a little more about the plot and maybe more about the production (esp. financing).
  • Shane Abbess doesn't need to be red linked three times in the infobox. Once is enough.
  • Some of the plot is rather choppy. Try combining some shorter sentences together. For example: Each side has sent seven warriors: Arc angels from heaven, Fallen angels from hell. They must assume human form to enter purgatory. --> Heaven has sent seven Arc angels, and Hell has sent seven Fallen angels to battle, but they must assume human form to enter purgatory. - that isn't the best example, but you get the idea.
  • What is The Light? Is it literal or figurative? explain.
  • Actually, the whole article could use a thorough copy edit.
  • Make sure in-line references are in numerical order. There are at least a couple of times where this is a problem, especially in the reception section.
  • How did the DVD sales do? In Australia? In the US?

The article will remain on hold for one week, and then I will decide whether I can pass or fail the article. Thanks and good luck! Nikki311 21:12, 15 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

The week will be up in a few hours, but I am going to go ahead and fail the article because these concerns have not been addressed. Nikki311 03:37, 22 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Budget

edit

This change [1], changed the budget from $150,000 to $200,000. While I have read that the budget was close to $150,000 [2], the official site states that it was just under $200,000. Given that there might be confusion over the issue, should this be referenced? DigitalC (talk) 08:03, 27 May 2008 (UTC).Reply

I just noticed that elsewhere in the article it is referenced as being $150,000, using the following RS as a reference [3]. ? DigitalC (talk) 08:06, 27 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

YO, on the Gabriel OFFICIAL website, there was a post on pre-production work for the sequel...souldnt that be added here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.4.186.6 (talk) 15:42, 24 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Gabriel (2007 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:29, 9 October 2017 (UTC)Reply