Talk:Gamemaker (disambiguation)

Latest comment: 10 months ago by Amakuru in topic Requested move 9 January 2024

Requested move 9 January 2024

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved  — Amakuru (talk) 22:13, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply


GamemakerGamemaker (disambiguation)GameMaker is very obviously the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for this word (as well as Game Maker). I believe this should be moved to make way for a WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 18:31, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Note: WikiProject Games has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:07, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Note: WikiProject Software has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:07, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Note: WikiProject Video games has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:08, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Note: WikiProject Disambiguation has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:08, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, I know WP:NWFCTYM, but gamemaker is to me, anyone who makes games, videogames or TTRPG or otherwise. I didn't know the game engine existed until this RM. Speaking of personal feelings, I hope this does not become a WP:SMALLDETAILS RM. Those stay open for weeks because they're difficult to close.
Since my comment is so vibes-based, I'm willing to reconsider if there's data showing some primary topic. Thanks, Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 01:41, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose. The terms "game maker" and "gamemaker" seem to be used not infrequently outside the name of the engine as a colloquial term for video game developer:
The engine could very well be the primary topic (especially for the version without a space) but so far this isn't substantively proven. Support per discussion below. ― novov (t c) 10:53, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • @Rotideypoc41352: @Mir Novov: Clickstream data from Wikinav would seem to show that most people click through to the engine, not "video game developer". Visitors from the DAB page make up 2.32% of the article's monthly views, and only 0.05% of "Game developer"'s monthly views, an extremely tiny amount. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 14:26, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
    Fair enough, I'll change my vote then. ― novov (t c) 01:35, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
    I find the news and book sources Mir Novov listed above illuminating. WP:DPT cautions against relying solely on any one metric (e.g. WikiNav or usage in English-language reliable sources) to determine the primary topic. So, it's helpful for any other participants (and the closer) to see multiple datasets.
    For example, I am weighing the fact that news headlines often use shorter phrases that may not reflect actual usage against WikiNav's data, which reflects only a month of <300 views per month. (One should hope that the articles and books above are clocking more than 300 views a month.) At this point, I have no strong views on the proposed move. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 16:46, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
    In my experience, "Gamemaker" or "Game maker" is just a weird, unusual and rarely-used phrase to describe a game developer with. "Gamedev", "game developer/game dev" or "indie dev" is far more common. Google Ngrams also bears that out, with "game maker" being tremendously less used. It has a spike in views when made case-insensitive, likely due to the engine, which used to be called "Game Maker" before changing its name. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 18:50, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • Support, mainly per Zxcvbnm. While "game maker" in reference to a game developer/publisher is used in some headlines, like shown above, this seems to mainly be a headlinese convention; even in the linked articles, it's a much less common term in those articles' body text. ModernDayTrilobite (talkcontribs) 21:04, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.