This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I have changed the Synopsis to Plot. I have also eliminated the paragraph it contained about the water-fueled car, because it was incorrect. A water-fueled car is a car that derives its energy from water. What the movie talked about was a water-injected engine, which uses water to vaporize gas better to get more energy out of it. And it is also not exactly what the movie began with.bruvensky (talk) 07:02, 7 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
This page needs lots of help, and I would not discourage you from working on it. I concur on your point about water-injection, which actually CAN improve efficiency, but, as you state, is not about using water as fuel.
That said, I have to take issue with 'plot'. The word plot is usually used in fiction, or in stories based on fact, but written in story form. 'Synopsis' is the more correct term for a concise summary of the facts presented and the points made in a documentary. Unless I see a cogent argument here against, I intend to change the subhead back to 'Synopsis.'
But, please, edit on! Continue to be bold. Fight the good fight! There is much to do, and all available hands are needed on deck. "For the harvest is great, and the workers are few." Rags (talk) 01:31, 22 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
