Talk:Gastridiota

Lepidoptera Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lepidoptera, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of butterflies and moths on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LepidopteraWikipedia:WikiProject LepidopteraTemplate:WikiProject LepidopteraLepidoptera articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: New South Wales / Queensland / Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Gastridiota is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Monotypic taxon

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Gastridiota is a monotypic genus. As a result and per WP:MONOTYPICFAUNA, the article should be at the genus-level entry, not species-level as it currently is. Moving the page thusly, but leaving a full message here because of the character limitations of an edit summary. The relevant text of the entry linked above is as follows: "the ranks with identical member organisms should not be separated into different articles, and the article (if there is no common name) should go under the scientific name of lowest rank, but no lower than the monotypic genus."

Sources that outright state Gastridiota to be monotypic:

THE EARLY STAGES OF GASTRIDIOTA ADOXIMA (TURNER) (LEPIDOPTERA: BOMBYCOIDEA) AND ITS FAMILY PLACEMENT (PDF) - Abstract: "The monotypic genus Gastridiota Turner is transferred from the Eupterotidae to the Bombycidae."
Natural History Museum's Butterflies and Moths of the World - "Type-species designation: by monotypy"

Beyond that, there's a plenitude of sources listing Gastridiota with exactly one species—G. adoxima—whereas I have yet to find a single source listing it with multiple species (which would be needed for it to be non-monotypic). A couple of examples:

Funet gives G. adoxima as only species in Gastridiota.
Atlas of Living Australia does the same.
Boldsystems Taxonomy Browsers does so too.
As does Discover Life

AddWittyNameHere (talk) 19:27, 17 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic