Wikipedia

Talk:Gate of Mercy Synagogue

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page
Former good article nomineeGate of Mercy Synagogue was a Philosophy and religion good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 29, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 19, 2008.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the 210-year old Gate of Mercy Synagogue is the oldest synagogue in Mumbai?

GA Review

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago8 comments2 people in discussion
This review is transcluded from Talk:Gate of Mercy Synagogue/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

I will review this article. Cirt (talk) 23:09, 10 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image review

Images used in this article:

  1. File:Gate of Mercy Synagogue 3.jpg - Located on Wikimedia Commons. Taken by Nichalp (talk · contribs), checks out, and image page contains appropriate information.   Done. Cirt (talk) 07:09, 15 December 2008 (UTC)Reply
  2. File:Mumbai area locator map.svg - Located at Wikimedia Commons. Made by Planemad (talk · contribs), will inquire further about this one.
    Started a deletion discussion of this one at Commons - I am not certain that material from Google Maps can be licensed under "GFDL / Creative Commons - Share Alike", so hopefully this discussion will prove fruitful. Cirt (talk) 07:09, 15 December 2008 (UTC)Reply
Stability review complete. Cirt (talk) 05:25, 17 December 2008 (UTC)Reply
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Stability review
  1. Review of article's edit history reveals no problems or issues/disputes.
  2. Review of article's talk page history also shows no issues.

  Done. Cirt (talk) 05:25, 17 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Good article nomination on hold

edit

This article's Good Article promotion has been put on hold. During review, some issues were discovered that can be resolved without a major re-write. This is how the article, as of December 17, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Pass. Written in clear and understandable wording.
2. Factually accurate?: Pass. Duly cited throughout to WP:RS/WP:V secondary sources.
3. Broad in coverage?: Not passing at this time. Issues remain to be addressed here.
  • Per WP:LEAD, the lede should be a summary of the article, and should stand alone as its own piece. Instead, the lede appears to introduce new information, not yet present later on in the article body itself.
  • The article and amount of references used seems a bit skimpy. Surely with a bit more research more sources can be found to incorporate into the article and expand it further with more info?
4. Neutral point of view?: Pass. Article is written in a neutral, matter of fact tone.
5. Article stability? Pass. See above.
6. Images?: Pending. See above.


Please do not intersperse comments, but instead respond to above points, below. Thank you.

Please address these matters soon and then leave a note here showing how they have been resolved. After 48 hours the article should be reviewed again. If these issues are not addressed within 7 days, the article may be failed without further notice. Thank you for your work so far. Cirt (talk) 06:46, 17 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Will look around for more text. Difficult as when I went there, the place was padlocked. Am away till 2009 =Nichalp «Talk»= 13:25, 29 December 2008 (UTC)Reply
Ah okay I'll wait a bit more. Cirt (talk) 13:31, 29 December 2008 (UTC)Reply
edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gate of Mercy Synagogue. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:35, 11 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gate_of_Mercy_Synagogue&oldid=1207232111"