| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
COI editing
editOne of the editors is named User:GautamDesiraju - if this is the subject of the article, it would be WP:COI. If it is not, it should be treated as paid editing. In either case the article is largely promotional in tone and needs to be re-examined for neutrality. Shyamal (talk) 02:17, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- Edits are mainly important Bro StaRs (talk) 01:16, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- There seems to be a lot of focus on the number of citations they have "With more than 65,000 citations and an h-index of 104, he is the second most highly cited scientist in India.". There are also many claims that are not backed up by sources; for example, almost all of the major research contributions section and the whole of the ISI ratings section. I wonder if most of this information needs to be removed as it seems promotional. Sleepingandsnoring (talk) 11:45, 28 July 2024 (UTC)