Talk:Gautama Buddha in world religions

More Sources!

I'd really like to see some expansion of this page, perhaps with further studies and inquiries into this matter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.127.51.196 (talk • contribs) 04:37, 2008 January 3 (UTC)

Dainichi Nyorai

I'm not sure about including this passage: "In Japan, since one of the symbols of Dainichi Nyorai (one of the non-historical buddhas of Mahayana Buddhism) was the sun, many equated Amaterasu, the Sun Goddess, with a previous reincarnation (bodhisattva) of Dainichi Nyorai." Judging by the title, this article seems like it should be restricted to discussing one particular Buddha, i.e. the historical Shakyamuni Buddha.—Nat Krause^{(Talk!·What have I done?)} 03:29, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

No neutral point of view

This paragraph seems to be out of context and to fail to provide a neutral point of view:

Actually Buddha is not Prophet of anyone and he is not God. "Buddha" meaning "awakened one" or "the enlightened one".

Can it be deleted? Soparamens (talk) 00:20, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

n the article it is mentioned as: "However, while he was against the authority of the Vedas, he might not have been against the Vedas themselves. Buddhist scholar Rahula Vipola wrote that the Buddha was trying to shed light on the true meaning of the Vedas. Buddha is said to be a knower of the Veda (vedajña) or of the Vedanta (vedântajña) (Sa.myutta, i. 168) and (Sutta Nipâta, 463)."

however there is no credible source for the above stated.As a matter of fact even the name is mentioned incorrectly as Rahula Vipola instead of the scholar Walpola Sri Rahula.And the famous professor never commented as above.Therefore if the author fails to quote a credible source kindly remove this erroneous statement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Searchnreach (talk • contribs) 12:56, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gautama Buddha in world religions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070926235132/http://srimadbhagavatam.com/1/3/24/en1 to http://srimadbhagavatam.com/1/3/24/en1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:17, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gautama Buddha in world religions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130521022342/http://srimadbhagavatam.com/1/3/en1 to http://srimadbhagavatam.com/1/3/en1
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130521022342/http://srimadbhagavatam.com/1/3/en1 to http://srimadbhagavatam.com/1/3/en1
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://en.wiekisource.org/wiki/1911_Encyclop%C3%A6dia_Britannica/Barlaam_and_Josaphat

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:28, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Gautam buddha has made his own religion Buddhism nothing is related to Hinduism don't predict that he was avatar of vishnu n all . Buddha has done on his and he didn't believed in Hinduism!

Gautam buddha has made his own religion Buddhism nothing is related to Hinduism don't predict that he was avatar of vishnu n all . Buddha has done on his and he didn't believed in Hinduism!so keep Hinduism and Buddhism topic separately Shravika12 (talk) 21:09, 24 July 2022 (UTC)