Talk:Gender quota

Untitled

The article seems to be in good shape! The article is really strong in its organization. It’s very clear and easy to find where information is located in the article. The article maybe needs some more information. While most sections are well fleshed out, it seems that maybe the sections on criticism and international support aren’t quite finished yet, and would benefit from more information. The lead could also be a bit longer and include information about the structure of the article. While I think that the clearness and directness of the article is really great, I think sometimes it could benefit from some fleshing out of ideas, rather than being so straight to the point all the time. For example, I think the article could be even better if you expanded on placement mechanisms, and how they may differ in different areas. The table doesn’t make a ton of sense to me either- I think I understand what you mean, but it could be more clear. I think the article is really strong in its neutrality. It does a really good job of presenting facts without privileging an argument. The article is also really strong in its sources. They’re very strong, and I like the sources you used outside of what we’ve read in class. Overall, I think this article is in good shape and well on its way to being done! Emmap2 (talk) 22:29, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2021 and 22 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Bschutz11. Peer reviewers: Emmap2, Luisatolda.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:00, 18 January 2022 (UTC)