Talk:Genome Valley

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

[Untitled]

edit

necessary changes are made, article is moderately important, please refrain from POV, fresh rating is needed now, thank you Curtlyambrose (talk) 14:55, 13 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

I totally understand the importance of generating traffic to the article. However, it is equally important to maintain consistency in terms of positioning the entire cluster.

There are small errors:

1) For instance, in type, you have mentioned 'Science Park' which is quite misleading because you cannot have two science parks (Alexandria Knowledge Park and IKP Knowledge Park) within the science park. Hence, we should stick to R&D District.

2) Also, request you to please change the first statement as "Genome Valley is Hyderabad's R&D District, spread across......." instead of biopharmaceutical and high-technology business district because R&D district would suffice for everything.

3) Finally, requesting you to please change the header 'Biocluster' to 'R&D Parks' (section on IKP & AKP) as Genome Valley is a cluster while AKP & IKP are parks (components of Genome Valley).

Hope you'll make these changes. Thanks. --Biotech8901 (talk) 06:08, 14 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hii Biotech 8901

edit

I made the changes requested from u, it is not R & D (R AND CENTER ARE ALREADY LISTED) at all or biocluster, I have changed it to Components, thanx

Please please kindly refrain from silly view points, Science park is a category whether it is IKP or SP or some 1000 parks, category is just science park

Kindly note that it is not Hyderabad's R & D, it is a true and thorough high technology business district, biotechnology comes under high technology sector, further, it is a business district in the sense, it started as a venture capital center from global investors in pharma business, thanx Curtlyambrose (talk) 05:16, 15 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

KINDLY NOTE THIS

edit

KINDLY NOTE THAT: WIKIPEDIA IS FOR LAY MAN, WHO IS NOT AWARE OF SOMETHING WIKIPEDIA IS NOT JUST REPRODUCING WHAT IS THERE IN A WEBSITE or a Reference or original research it is an encyclopedia in a neutral point of view supported with published sources Curtlyambrose (talk) 05:19, 15 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Major revert

edit

My apologies to anyone who follows this article for the state I must temporarily leave it in, but for the past 3 years, it's been maintained by a steady stream of sockpuppets. Per our normal procedure, I have reverted the article back to the state before that user became involved (although, for all I know, even some of the earlier versions are also tainted). I'll try to come back to this and put it into some sort of order, but the sockpuppeteer needs to understand--he cannot edit Wikipedia. Period. Even if it's for "constructive" purposes. Qwyrxian (talk) 15:51, 31 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Genome Valley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:21, 9 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Genome Valley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:37, 12 October 2017 (UTC)Reply