Talk:George Bradshaw
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Bradshaw's Date Of Birth
editBradshaw's date of birth appears to be misquoted in many books and on many websites, he was born 29th July 1800 (not 1801). His gravestone states that he was 53 when he died in September 1853, this concurs with the baptism entry in the Windsor New Chapel registry, where he was Christened in 1802, which clearly states "born 29th July 1800". Newcomber (talk) 20:11, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Untitled
editI have to admit to finding Wiki's rating system way over my head. However I will say an article about Bradshaw is totally justified. I have edited one word (so far) and that is important. The first Bradshaw was the first compilation of railway timetables. There had been railway timetables before. It's obvious there were and various books show these like Train & Transport showing an 1835 Stockton & Darlington one. I have an 1838 Grand Junction one headed Time Table in Cornish's guide. Should anyone be able to input a more exact last date (exact day) for the last 1961 Bradshaw that would be helpful. Robertforsythe 14:24, 10 February 2007 (UTC)Robertforsythe 14:33, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
1841 Bradshaw - was it really only 8 pages?
editA message on the uk.railway Usenet newsgroup today (thread title: "Bradshaws Railway Guide") suggests otherwise. A quote: "The John Rylands Library copies of the 1841 edition have 49 un-numbered pages; the Goldsmiths Library copy scanned for the MOME on-line edition seems to have "[38] leaves (some folded)" but there's definitely more than eight." So where did the "eight pages" comment on our article come from? 86.136.253.102 (talk) 22:25, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Currency references?
editWhat does this mean: "...had risen in price to two shillings (2s/10p)" Since when is 2 shillings equivalent to 2 shillings and ten pence??? Br77rino (talk) 00:09, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Assessment comment
editThe comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:George Bradshaw/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
I have to admit to finding Wiki's rating system way over my head. However I will say an article about Bradshaw is totally justified. I have edited one word (so far) and that is important. The first Bradshaw was the first compilation of railway timetables. There had been railway timetables before. It's obvious there were and various books show these like Train & Transport showing an 1835 Stockton & Darlington one. I have an 1838 Grand Junction one headed Time Table in Cornish's guide. Should anyone be able to input a more exact last date (exact day) for the last 1961 Bradshaw that would be helpful. Robertforsythe 14:24, 10 February 2007 (UTC) |
Last edited at 14:24, 10 February 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 15:58, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on George Bradshaw. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120421031944/http://www.mcrh.mmu.ac.uk/pubs/pdf/mrhr_17ii_thomas.pdf to http://www.mcrh.mmu.ac.uk/pubs/pdf/mrhr_17ii_thomas.pdf
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://bradshawsguides.com/the-bradshaw-lagacy.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:21, 1 December 2017 (UTC)