Talk:George E. Smith (gambler)

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleGeorge E. Smith (gambler) has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 19, 2010Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 29, 2010.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that American handicapper George E. Smith won $115,000 on one horse race in 1891, the largest payout recorded in the US to that date?

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:George E. Smith (gambler)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wizardman Operation Big Bear 17:26, 16 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

I'll review this article within the next few days. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 17:26, 16 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Here are the concerns I found:

  • "which is comparable to over $76 million in 2009 $US" We could probably use Template:Inflation for this. Not required, but might be helpful.
  • "George Smith's father died within a year after moving to the city" within a year of sounds better
    • Done
  • "in Chicago but he eventually ran" confusing wording; reword. Do you mean he just up and moved elsewhere?
    • Done, he relocated to New York state within a couple of years because business was better there and "less corrupt." Not sure how valid that last bit was.
  • Nitpicking, but in the Cadmus' section, the numbers aren't really adding up. The horse had two wins yet you say he won money from the "few victories". Keep them consistent. You also have him winning $200,000, when the numbers below don't quite add up to that.
    • Done, the press did not seem to know the exact value at the time and often quoted it as 200,000. I just tallied it to $195,000.
  • "1897 ."space needs fixing
    • fixed
  • "But Smith soon tired of the jockey's off-track antics," The but at the start probably isn't needed, reads better without it.
    • fixed
  • "When James R. Keene asked Smith in late 1897 for permission to take Sloan to England to race in the Cambridgeshire Handicap, Smith did not refuse the offer." Saying that he accepted the offer sounds better. If he didn't really care either way though then this can be omitted, since that's what seems to be implied.
    • Done, he was pretty put-out with Sloan by that time.
  • "allowed James R. Keene to employee Willie Shaw for much of the season" 'to employ' you mean?

I'll put this on hold for seven days, and pass upon completion/fail upon nothing being done. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 03:49, 18 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Looks good now, article passes. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 01:26, 19 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on George E. Smith (gambler). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:26, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply