Talk:Georges Fontenis

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Sources

edit

@Charles01, anarkismo.net is not a reliable source (no editorial pedigree, reputation for accuracy). If the piece haven't been published in source of repute, the information should be considered unverified and removed. If the article is a retread of the alternativelibertaire.org source, then only use what can be reliably sourced there (I can't vouch for Alternative libertaire's editorial vetting either, or whether it's closer to a magazine of repute or a partisan rag, but its 25-year publication history is a step in the right direction)   czar 18:13, 7 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

The source to which you object most is in English which for some purposes is helpful. The other is in French. As you may have spotted, they are both essentially taken from the same article, but I cannot tell which was taken first. They have both been subject to some pruning in the versions to which I attached a link, I think. The entry would certainly benefit from more sources. With such a political subject we should not wish to restrict out sourcing to one political slant or another. However, most of the sources you get from googling this fellow do seem to come from the political left (and to be in French) which I suppose is what you'd expect. I think what we have is a worthwhile start, but certainly it's a work in progress. You are most welcome to add sources that you like better! It's mostly pretty basic factual stuff, but where if gets beyond that, there's always scope for giving more than one version and explaining that sources differ. As they sometimes do. Regards Charles01 (talk) 18:34, 7 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
I write in this topic area as well, so your other points noted, I'm only recommending that the anarkismo-sourced info be resourced/removed czar 03:51, 8 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Georges Fontenis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:40, 26 November 2017 (UTC)Reply