Talk:Get a Horse!

IP edits

Please explain why the unsourced information deserves to be in this article.--JOJ ^Hutton 11:55, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Get a Horse!. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6DZOQ92zN?url=http%3A%2F%2Foscar.go.com%2Fnominees to http://oscar.go.com/nominees

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:30, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Relation to The Band Concert

Hi Am I the only one that thing that the music at the is related to the old mickey mouse movie "The Band Concert"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zibib2 (talk • contribs) 22:39, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Poster

Bedivere and James0231132321 have been edit warring about using the theatrical release poster in the infobox. Bedivere's claim is "Poster is not discussed in the article and so the fair use rationale fails. Do not reinstate unless you are willing to write a paragraph or two exclusively about the poster (if there is such a material)."

This is not necessary for a film infobox. I don't think there's a single article on the entire wiki that contains two paragraphs exclusively about the poster. Using the non-free poster is fine, as per every other film article on the wiki. Toughpigs (talk) 18:28, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

It is not. A free alternative is possible in this case and that is why it's been replaced. The poster may be used only if there is no free alternative, but there is one here. Using the poster, as a matter of fact, is just a choice of like, but it is not permitted by Wikipedia policies. Bedivere (talk) 18:29, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Copying from my edit summaries. the non free poster has been effectively replaced by a free alternative. there is absolutely no need to reinstate it. further, the fair use rationale used is not appropriate. please do not reinstate it again. please also remember that the use of fair use media is exceptional, not justifying every single possible use of a non free file, as it is the case here. the user who has tried to reinstate it only has reasoned the poster is better suited than the title card for the infobox, but that is only a choice, not according to the guidelines and policies, because a free alternative does exist. Bedivere (talk) 18:32, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

What makes you think that the title card is free? That's an adaptation of an old title card, but it was still created in 2013, at the same time as the rest of the film. Toughpigs (talk) 18:35, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

It has no creative elements that distinguish it from the 1928 Steamboat Willie title card, only changing the title. Such a minor addition does not generate a new copyright. This case is similar to that of the Barn Dance poster. Bedivere (talk) 18:37, 9 May 2024 (UTC)