Talk:Gilbert Hill
Latest comment: 15 years ago by InfiniteThinking in topic according to experts
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gilbert Hill article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
according to experts
editThe section starting according to experts sounds like a weasel statement to me, but I don't know how to fix it.InfiniteThinking (talk) 22:54, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Assessment comment
editThe comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Gilbert Hill/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Still a long way to go. =Nichalp «Talk»= 07:10, 2 May 2008 (UTC) |
Last edited at 07:10, 2 May 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 16:15, 29 April 2016 (UTC)