Talk:Gina Raimondo

What has she done as Governor?

What has Governor Raimondo done since being elected Governor, either through executive action or bills signed into law? 72.87.72.228 (talk) 22:07, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Edit summary correction

I would like to clarify my recent summary to this article which read "revert unexplained deletion of information on his daughter", that edit summary should have been "revert unsourced edits", both of which are in my saved edit summaries, and I accidently entered the wrong edit summary and saved it before realizing my error.--TommyBoy (talk) 00:48, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gina Raimondo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120226235648/http://www.businessweek.com:80/news/2012-01-18/gina-raimondo-math-convinces-rhode-island-of-america-s-prospects.html to http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-01-18/gina-raimondo-math-convinces-rhode-island-of-america-s-prospects.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111018064133/http://www.wpri.com:80/dpp/news/local_news/providence/report-reveals-scope-of-pension-crisis to http://www.wpri.com/dpp/news/local_news/providence/report-reveals-scope-of-pension-crisis

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:38, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Hack?

Looks like someone inserted that she is an alien... please fix! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.10.86.245 (talk) 18:02, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Neutrality of Article

The neutrality of this article is deeply disturbed. I've made two edits already that appear to have been directly lifted from the political campaigns of her opponents. I kept the criticism but removed the biased language. Tastybaldeagle (talk) 16:38, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

The article itself is of an American politician who implemented, with various degrees of success, policies either through rule making and/or legislation that effects various aspects of life of a person. Normally, these policies/rules/laws are able to be viewed through a partisan lens, thus, allow any number of valid opinions to occur which are valid from any given POV. Thus, when for example PayDay lending reform is listed is any controversy better listed under its subheading or is it better addressed in its own section? That's the question at hand. Neutrality is not had by only stating one side of an opinion & of course a valid POV of opposition for any particular policy/legislation/etc could naturally occur from ones political opponent. By eliminating 'controversy' on any particular aspect of a politicians life, supported policies, etc. simply because it came from a political opponent then such an act would relegate any like article nothing more than a billboard from which a politician or political party can delivery a message of their choosing.69.243.69.173 (talk) 03:19, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

COVID praise is buried in a large "criticisms" section

Why is that? Tondelleo Schwarzkopf (talk) 01:30, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Raimondo still governor, until she resigns.

At times like this, articles such as these should be protected or semi-protected. 'PLEASE', Raimondo didn't stop being governor, the moment she was confirmed to Biden's cabinet. So wait until she RESIGNS, before you make such changes. GoodDay (talk) 00:07, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

She might as well have resigned, she noped out of there in a snap. No interviews nothing. Stepping stone. Scientificaldan (talk) 05:49, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Jewish Ancestry?

I remember reading a book about geneologies and it listed Gina as having Jewish ancestry, is this wrong? Maybe I'm confusing her husband for her, who appears to be Jewish. Though, again, there's no proof for either of these claims. 97.46.64.92 (talk) 04:07, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Report: Advertising for Huawei

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/09/07/huawei-meme-gina-raimondo-mat60/

This article's titled "Chinese memes make U.S. envoy unwitting brand ambassador for new Huawei phone", but some photos suggest she was very active in these matters. Criticism ensued. --2A02:908:898:9780:81C9:9FC0:D30C:CED5 (talk) 19:34, 15 September 2023 (UTC)