Talk:Ginevra de' Benci
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Are we certain this is painted by Leonardo Da Vinci?
editThe article on Leonardo Da Vinci states that this painting is attributed to Da Vinci most of the time, but that it is not certain and there are critics how maintain a different opinion. I am not an expert on this subject, but if there is literature presenting this opinion it would seem important for the purposes of a neutral point of view to at least mention the evidence supporting a painter who is not Da Vinci. PhilipDSullivan 22:56, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Only example in the US?
editMy understanding is that this painting is the only Da Vinci (If he did in fact create it) in the United States...is that worth mentioning? Antimatter--talk-- 17:39, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- This is debatable depending on whether The Dreyfus Madonna is by Leonardo. Phil5329 (talk)
According to the National Gallery's information placard next to the painting, this is the only painting by Leonardo in the Americas. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.127.186.72 (talk) 22:13, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Peeling Paint?
editI seem to remember hearing a long time ago that Leonardo mixed his own pigments, and that the paint on this portrait is beginning to crack and peel away, not being a particularly good batch. Has anyone else heard similar? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Albino Bebop (talk • contribs) 15:18, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Original research tag
editI added the tag regarding the paragraph describing her smile etc. Perhaps quote somebody who said that?-Phil5329 (talk)
Ginevra's dates
editThe dates given seem highly improbable since they are the dates of Leonardo da Vinci, the painter of the portrait. Also the portrait is said to be painted in 1474 when the sitter was 16. In which case she could not have been born in in 1452 since that would have made her 22 at the time of the picture. I do not know her real dates so cannot edit this satisfactorily. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sardanapalus (talk • contribs) 12:34, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
- I've removed the erroneous dates and added that she was born around 1458. This is based on the information available on the National Gallery of Art Website which appears authoritative: "probably commissioned about the time of her marriage at age sixteen. Leonardo himself was only about six years older." The date of her death may not be known. Aa77zz (talk) 16:36, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Of two minds
editThe article appears not to have its mind made up about its topic. Is it the person Ginevra de' Benci or the painting by Leonardo?
- If it is the person, as the lead suggests, the article title should not be in italics. The article is actually not very informative about the person beyond that she was admired for her intelligence – where does that snippet of information come from? not from the cited source. The material that is really about the painting and not the portrait should appear in a separate section.
- If it is the painting, the lead should reflect that. A separate section entitled "Identification", given the uncertainty and various theories on who the is actually portrayed here, would be in order.
--Lambiam 16:51, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
- Changed the lead to fix this problem. --Robert.Allen (talk) 23:34, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
File:Leonardo da Vinci, Ginevra de' Benci, 1474-78.png to appear as POTD
editHello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Leonardo da Vinci, Ginevra de' Benci, 1474-78.png will be appearing as picture of the day on June 21, 2013. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2013-06-21. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:48, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Angelo Paratico's views
editThis Hong-Kong based journalist has written a book, Leonardo Da Vinci. A Chinese Scholar Lost in Renaissance Italy, which has received considerable publicity, enough to be mentioned in various relevant articles. There has been of course criticism. See for instance [1] (I'm not sure if this meets RS but it gives some context for us), [2], [3], [4], [5] and many other sources. Doug Weller (talk) 09:39, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ginevra de' Benci. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.nga.gov/fcgi-bin/tinfo_f?object=50724.0&detail=none - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051221044032/http://www.nga.gov/kids/ginevra.htm to http://www.nga.gov/kids/ginevra.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:44, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Poems about Ginevra
editDoes anyone know what the poems were Or where to find them? Semanade (talk) 12:13, 12 November 2018 (UTC)