This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anarchism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anarchism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnarchismWikipedia:WikiProject AnarchismTemplate:WikiProject Anarchismanarchism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article was accepted on 26 July 2014 by reviewer DGG (talk·contribs).
No, I did that because the whole article goes too much into a hagiographic direction. That Szasz quote is just one example. This guy is WP:FRINGE and needs to be treated accordingly. --Hob Gadling (talk) 19:46, 1 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Errmmm, you began your opening sentence above with my edit? And then said "The content of the quote is just that Szasz liked him and that they agreed about their fringe ideas"?? Martinevans123 (talk) 19:53, 1 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Yes. I do not know what are you trying to say by repeating that.
I told you the reason why I alerted FTN because you asked. I see no point in a lengthy discussion about whether that was my reason for alerting FTN. Instead this page is about how to improve the article. --Hob Gadling (talk) 20:07, 1 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Obviously you don't know. I guess you could not possibly imagine how anyone might interpret your comment as I did. Good luck at WP:FTN. I don't see much mention if WP:FRINGE at Thomas Szasz. If you really think this article "has hagiographic elements", you could always enumerate them here and request a discussion. I suspect that's what the good folk at WP:FTN will advise you to do. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:24, 1 January 2024 (UTC) p.s. if you want to help improve the article, you might want to start by searching for any source(s) for his date and place of birth? I don't think those are "hagiographic elements".Reply
I guess you could not possibly imagine how anyone might interpret your comment as I did True, because you never said how you interpret it. I can not read your thoughts unless you write them down here.
FTN has all different sorts of experts, and they know what to do. (I am not interested in birth dates. I am interested in keeping profringe text out. It's called division of labor.) --Hob Gadling (talk) 21:22, 1 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
It was a guess about general interpretation, not just mine. I guess you'd see "division of labor" as more important than collaboration. I await the arrival of the FTN experts with interest. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:53, 1 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
